From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jakub_Ambro=BFewicz?= Subject: Re: superblock problem Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3D19C1DA.3070508@vigor.com.pl> References: <3D19A3ED.6040201@vigor.com.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On 6/26/02 1:22 PM, Jakub Ambro=BFewicz wrote: > So i thought maybe i used wrong version and tried > all of the options, still no result. And now i stuck I forgot to mention that two upper version options of --rebuild-sb (ie 3.6.x and 3.5.9) resulted in superblock beeing written at block 16. Two lower versions wrote sb at block 2. But kernel still expected them to be at block 8. JA