From: "Jesse W. Asher" <jasher1@tampabay.rr.com>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Natted IRC "inherently insecure"?
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 07:42:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D243492.6090408@tampabay.rr.com> (raw)
Someone recently indicated to me that they believed that natting IRC
through a firewall was "inherently insecure" and I wanted to get
opinions on that statement. I guess, in my mind, it isn't any more or
less secure than any other service natted through the firewall - it all
depends on how comfortable you feel with the inherent security of the
client/tool that you're using.
Comments?
--
Jesse W. Asher jasher1@tampabay.rr.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-04 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-04 11:42 Jesse W. Asher [this message]
2002-07-08 0:19 ` Natted IRC "inherently insecure"? Stephen Frost
2002-07-08 0:38 ` Martin Josefsson
2002-07-08 23:26 ` Jesse W. Asher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-04 22:10 George Vieira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D243492.6090408@tampabay.rr.com \
--to=jasher1@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.