From: "Pedro M. Rodrigues" <pmanuel@myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Removing CAP_SYS_RAWIO
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 13:01:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D2ADE97.3211.9586B6@localhost> (raw)
Hello! Has anyone experience with removing CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability
in the recent 2.4 kernels? I searched around to look for real life
examples, but the only definitive answer seems to be that X breaks.
>From my head, other candidates to breaking are things like hwclock
and setserial, maybe i am wrong?
Thanks,
Pedro
reply other threads:[~2002-07-09 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D2ADE97.3211.9586B6@localhost \
--to=pmanuel@myrealbox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.