From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Jackson Subject: Re: Vitural Network Interfaces Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:32:50 -0600 Sender: linux-admin-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3D2C0D51.29C4C066@wcox.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Nathan Cc: Linux-Admin Nathan -- As far is the cable internet and router is concerned Box A = eth0 --192.168.0.1 -->|router (port 1)| -->206.196.128.1:1 ->internet Box B = eth0 --192.168.0.2 -->|router (port 2)| -->206.196.128.1:2 ->internet and the LAN would still be 192.168.0.x? Would you need to add a hub between router and the boxes? TIA, David Nathan wrote: > > A common reframe on http://linuxquestons.org is: > > > > 4 boxes each with one(1) nic card and each having a seperate connection through a router to the internet (CABLE/DSL). > > > > IN THEORY could you set up LAN using a virtual network interface on that > > one nic card i.e. > > Yeap, we utalize this for talking to power control devices and the like. > > -Nate > > > eth0 ----->router ---->internet > > eth0:1 --->LAN > > > > > > Calk this one up to lack of sleep :) > > > > David > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > -- > -- > "Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is > shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods." > Albert Einstein > > Chisolm's First Corollary to Murphy's Second Law: > When things just can't possibly get any worse, they will. > --