From: Ryan Martindale <ryan@qsicorp.com>
To: "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: fpu woes (TX3912)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:48:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D330B04.CDE3E332@qsicorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01c401c22c1c$1973a170$10eca8c0@grendel
"Kevin D. Kissell" wrote:
>
> > I'm using the tx3912 processor for an embedded device and since it
> > doesn't have an fpu, I don't have coprocessor #1. Recently, I remember
> > seeing a fix in process.c for exit_thread and flush_thread, and did
> > apply it - but there still is a problem (at least for me). In traps.c,
> > the save_fp_context and restore_fp_context are set to _save_fp_context
> > (in r2300_fpu.S) which don't check to see if I have a coprocessor
> > available. As I am rather new to the linux/linux-mips development world,
> > I thought I'd give a heads up (it is causing my embedded system to
> > crash). Any direction on fixing it would be welcome, but I'm not sure
> > I'll get to the point where I will submit any patches any time soon.
>
> People break things from time to time, but at least at one point
> in history, R3xxx platforms were correctly supported by the
> FPU emulator code. Looking at the source code on my
> system, it looks like traps.c has been "cleaned up" in a
> somewhat wierd manner, such that the test for whether
> there is an FPU happens redundantly, once in the specific
> case of a 4K family CPU (which you would not hit on your
> TX39), and again just after the switch on the CPU type.
> Did someone screw up the setting of mips_cpu.options
> for a TX39xx or something? Is that code missing from
> the sources that you're using? Are you sure that it isn't
> something else blowing up on you? There have been
> mods made locally here and there that might have
> broken the FPU emulator for R3xxx platforms, but
> I didn't think that any of them were up on OSS.sgi.com
> or kernel.org.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin K.
I am actually using the 2.4.18 stable kernel source, although I did
check the 2.5.14 source tree I have to see if any modifications had
taken place. My problem is the in signal.c function setup_sigcontext
has:
if (current->used_math) { /* fp is active. */
set_cp0_status(ST0_CU1);
err |= save_fp_context(sc);
last_task_used_math = NULL;
regs->cp0_status &= ~ST0_CU1;
current->used_math = 0;
}
There is no check to see if I have an FPU. I modified it to:
if (current->used_math) { /* fp is active. */
if (mips_cpu.options & MIPS_CPU_FPU) {
set_cp0_status(ST0_CU1);
err |= save_fp_context(sc);
regs->cp0_status &= ~ST0_CU1;
}
last_task_used_math = NULL;
current->used_math = 0;
}
And now I am not crashing. As far as how it is supposed to be setup, I
don't really know - like I said, I'm pretty new at this. I don't see any
ifdefs/checks around the code in traps.c
case CPU_R2000:
case CPU_R3000:
case CPU_R3000A:
case CPU_R3041:
case CPU_R3051:
case CPU_R3052:
case CPU_R3081:
case CPU_R3081E:
case CPU_TX3912:
case CPU_TX3922:
case CPU_TX3927:
save_fp_context = _save_fp_context;
restore_fp_context = _restore_fp_context;
I would think that traps.c would be were you would set up to handle
emulation (indeed it appears that there is an emulator option set up for
the processors with MIPS_CPU_4KEX && MIPS_CPU_4KTLB options set, but no
other locations seem to be concerned about this. Is this where floating
point should be dealt with?
Ryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-15 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-15 17:04 fpu woes (TX3912) Ryan Martindale
2002-07-15 16:24 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-15 16:24 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-15 17:48 ` Ryan Martindale [this message]
2002-07-15 18:04 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-15 18:04 ` Kevin D. Kissell
2002-07-16 14:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D330B04.CDE3E332@qsicorp.com \
--to=ryan@qsicorp.com \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.