From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3D35BD91.264AEE03@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:55:13 -0400 From: Karim Yaghmour Reply-To: karim@domain.hid MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] RT nanokernel working with ADEOS References: <1026904679.653.3.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid Errors-To: adeos-main-admin@domain.hid List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jerome Poichet Cc: adeos-main@gna.org Jerome Poichet wrote: > We managed to get a proprietary (sorry nobody's perfect) RT nanokernel > working with ADEOS. Thus we have two different OSes working at the same > time on the same computer thanks to ADEOS. This is great news. This is further proof of the viability of the idea. I had started looking into getting RTEMS to run on Adeos, but I ran out of time. Whoever actually knows RTEMS' internals well enough should actually be able to do such a port relatively easily. I've looked at porting uCos too, but the licensing of the OS requires that you purchase a copy of the book to get the sources. An RTEMS port is likely to be more useful to the masses since it's licensed under the GPL. There's also eCos, but its license isn't approved by the Open Source Initiative. Though, it would be a great way for RedHat to revive its dying OS. > Now we're working on ways to communicate between the two. Have a look at some of the papers we used to create Adeos. Many of the mechanisms required to have 2 OSes communicate with each other on top of a nanokernel are fairly well documented. Cheers, Karim =================================================== Karim Yaghmour karim@domain.hid Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert ===================================================