From: Leonardo Gomes Figueira <sabbath@planetarium.com.br>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Memory detection problem in 2.4.19-rc2
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 03:48:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D3CFC29.60006@planetarium.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.NEB.4.44.0207201806350.16962-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1161 bytes --]
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It seems that the change Christoph introduced (from Red Hat's tree) in the
> lines around 810 (line number in -rc3) in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c didn't
> consider the case that someone want's to _in_crease the size of the memory
> by using the "mem=" parameter.
>
> It's the following Changeset:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> Changeset details for 1.383.2.25
>
> ChangeSet@1.383.2.25 2002-04-15 23:18:40-03:00 hch@infradead.org
> all diffs
> [PATCH] mem= command lines fixes.
> Another patch from Red Hat's tree:
> mem= command-line adapts itself to existing e820 values.
> without this patch mem=xxxM ignores bios-reserved areas and uses
> them as RAM. This patch makes the kernel skip these areas
> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c@1.38 2001-04-05
> 21:19:09-03:00 hch@infradead.org
>
> <-- snip -->
Thanks for your help. I changed the code to the way it was before and it
worked fine. I'm running 2.4.19-rc3 now. :-)
I created a patch to undo this modification in case anyone has the same
problem, it's attached in this message.
Bye,
Léo
Leonardo Gomes Figueira
sabbath@planetarium.com.br
[-- Attachment #2: patch-memparam-2.4.19-rc3 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1175 bytes --]
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c.original Mon Jul 22 21:44:45 2002
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Tue Jul 23 03:38:08 2002
@@ -808,21 +808,29 @@
userdef = 1;
} else {
/* If the user specifies memory size, we
- * limit the BIOS-provided memory map to
- * that size. exactmap can be used to specify
- * the exact map. mem=number can be used to
- * trim the existing memory map.
+ * blow away any automatically generated
+ * size
*/
unsigned long long start_at, mem_size;
+ if (userdef == 0) {
+ /* first time in: zap the whitelist
+ * and reinitialize it with the
+ * standard low-memory region.
+ */
+ e820.nr_map = 0;
+ userdef = 1;
+ add_memory_region(0, LOWMEMSIZE(), E820_RAM);
+ }
mem_size = memparse(from+4, &from);
- if (*from == '@') {
+ if (*from == '@')
start_at = memparse(from+1, &from);
- add_memory_region(start_at, mem_size, E820_RAM);
- } else {
- limit_regions(mem_size);
+ else {
+ start_at = HIGH_MEMORY;
+ mem_size -= HIGH_MEMORY;
userdef=1;
}
+ add_memory_region(start_at, mem_size, E820_RAM);
}
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-23 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 8:07 Memory detection problem in 2.4.19-rc2 Leonardo Gomes Figueira
2002-07-20 16:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-07-23 6:48 ` Leonardo Gomes Figueira [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D3CFC29.60006@planetarium.com.br \
--to=sabbath@planetarium.com.br \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.