All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* adm1024
@ 2005-05-19  6:23 Roger Orchard
  2005-05-19  6:23 ` adm1024 Mark D. Studebaker
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Roger Orchard @ 2005-05-19  6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

we have a card with an adm1027 (this is one of the first R&D broads, with the chip on)

the adm1024 driver thinks that the adm1027 is the adm1024.

talking to "Analog Devices" they say that you should check:-
I believe that you can look at the Revision Reg 0x3F 

If it has a value of 0x10 - 0x1F, then it is a 1024 
If it has a value of 0x60 - 0x6F, then it is a 1027 

Also, as further verification, there are registers in the 1024 that do not exist in the 1027 and visa versa. 

we have also been looking at the LM87 witch is almost the same chip but from "National Semiconductor"

------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger
Tut System (UK) Ltd
+44 1865 78 45 60
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20020726/7e24bcc3/attachment.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* adm1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
@ 2005-05-19  6:23 ` Mark D. Studebaker
  2006-02-22 10:39 ` [lm-sensors] ADM1024 Murray Blakeman
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark D. Studebaker @ 2005-05-19  6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

so do you recommend that we add 1027 support to adm1024 or lm87, or make
a new driver?


> Roger Orchard wrote:
> 
> we have a card with an adm1027 (this is one of the first R&D broads,
> with the chip on)
> 
> the adm1024 driver thinks that the adm1027 is the adm1024.
> 
> talking to "Analog Devices" they say that you should check:-
> 
> I believe that you can look at the Revision Reg 0x3F
> 
> If it has a value of 0x10 - 0x1F, then it is a 1024
> If it has a value of 0x60 - 0x6F, then it is a 1027
> 
> Also, as further verification, there are registers in the 1024 that do
> not exist in the 1027 and visa versa.
> 
> we have also been looking at the LM87 witch is almost the same chip
> but from "National Semiconductor"
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger
> Tut System (UK) Ltd
> +44 1865 78 45 60

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] ADM1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
  2005-05-19  6:23 ` adm1024 Mark D. Studebaker
@ 2006-02-22 10:39 ` Murray Blakeman
  2006-02-24 21:52 ` Jim Cromie
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Murray Blakeman @ 2006-02-22 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Where can I get this module from?

I am running Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1 and the ADM1024 module doesn't appear to
be part of it.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] ADM1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
  2005-05-19  6:23 ` adm1024 Mark D. Studebaker
  2006-02-22 10:39 ` [lm-sensors] ADM1024 Murray Blakeman
@ 2006-02-24 21:52 ` Jim Cromie
  2006-03-03 20:43 ` Steven A. DuChene
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jim Cromie @ 2006-02-24 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Murray Blakeman wrote:
> Where can I get this module from?
>
> I am running Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1 and the ADM1024 module doesn't appear to
> be part of it.
>
>
>   
forgive me for not knowing, but you presume it to be supported ? but 
omitted ?

IOW, did you check if it is supported ?  and if not, are you interested 
in adding it ?

Im not trying to be snide here; there are other adm 102x devices supported,
(I hacked at 1026.c, but I dont have the chip to sanity test the patch,
and apparently no-one else does either)




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] ADM1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-24 21:52 ` Jim Cromie
@ 2006-03-03 20:43 ` Steven A. DuChene
  2006-03-05 20:53 ` Rudolf Marek
  2007-01-22 13:22 ` Jean Delvare
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Steven A. DuChene @ 2006-03-03 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

The non-2.6-integrated module code does indeed exist in the lm_sensors
source but I do not see any mention of anyone working on porting it
to the new 2.6 kernel hwmon infrastructure. The boards with the adm1024
exist (at least in Murray's and my case) and I am more than willing to test
any pre-release code or if there is good documentation on what has to
be done to migrate existing 2.4 modules for chips to the 2.6 hwmon chip
module code stuff I wouldn't mind looking that over as well.

Murray Blakeman wrote:
> Where can I get this module from?
>
> I am running Linux Kernel 2.6.15.1 and the ADM1024 module doesn't appear to
> be part of it.
>
>
>   

Jim Cromie replied:
> forgive me for not knowing, but you presume it to be supported ? but omitted ?
>
> IOW, did you check if it is supported ?  and if not, are you interested in adding it ?
>
> I'm not trying to be snide here; there are other adm 102x devices supported,
> (I hacked at 1026.c, but I dont have the chip to sanity test the patch,
> and apparently no-one else does either)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] ADM1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-03 20:43 ` Steven A. DuChene
@ 2006-03-05 20:53 ` Rudolf Marek
  2007-01-22 13:22 ` Jean Delvare
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rudolf Marek @ 2006-03-05 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Steven A. DuChene wrote:
> The non-2.6-integrated module code does indeed exist in the lm_sensors
> source but I do not see any mention of anyone working on porting it
> to the new 2.6 kernel hwmon infrastructure. The boards with the adm1024
> exist (at least in Murray's and my case) and I am more than willing to test
> any pre-release code or if there is good documentation on what has to
> be done to migrate existing 2.4 modules for chips to the 2.6 hwmon chip
> module code stuff I wouldn't mind looking that over as well.


Yes it is in the  porting-clients  see the Documentation/i2c/ directory.

You may also take a look how other drivers look like, mainly the interface
has been changed so please check the hwmon/sysfs-interface file too. If you
need further help with porting please write back.

Good luck,

Regards
Rudolf


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [lm-sensors] ADM1024
  2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-05 20:53 ` Rudolf Marek
@ 2007-01-22 13:22 ` Jean Delvare
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2007-01-22 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lm-sensors

Hi Steven,

On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:43:59 -0500 (EST), Steven A. DuChene wrote:
> The non-2.6-integrated module code does indeed exist in the lm_sensors
> source but I do not see any mention of anyone working on porting it
> to the new 2.6 kernel hwmon infrastructure. The boards with the adm1024
> exist (at least in Murray's and my case) and I am more than willing to test
> any pre-release code or if there is good documentation on what has to
> be done to migrate existing 2.4 modules for chips to the 2.6 hwmon chip
> module code stuff I wouldn't mind looking that over as well.

Did you finally take a chance at porting the driver, or not?

-- 
Jean Delvare


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-22 13:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-19  6:23 adm1024 Roger Orchard
2005-05-19  6:23 ` adm1024 Mark D. Studebaker
2006-02-22 10:39 ` [lm-sensors] ADM1024 Murray Blakeman
2006-02-24 21:52 ` Jim Cromie
2006-03-03 20:43 ` Steven A. DuChene
2006-03-05 20:53 ` Rudolf Marek
2007-01-22 13:22 ` Jean Delvare

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.