From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH CFT] tons of logging patches Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:59:39 +0400 Message-ID: <3D4A823B.7040803@namesys.com> References: <200206222202.56577.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <1024945533.9008.10.camel@tin y> <200207091552.52815.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <1026223243.5603.124.camel@tiny> <1026502991.4952.136.camel@tiny> <3D30CB31.8040703@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <1028291287.12934.207.camel@tiny> <1028291685.19330.215.camel@tiny> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Chris Mason Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Chris Mason wrote: >On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 08:28, Chris Mason wrote: > > >>Hello everyone, >> >>I've uploaded 03-data-logging-24.diff, which fixes a tail packing oops >>in data=journal mode, and fixes the data=ordered slow down (5-10%) >>introduced in -23. >> >> > >Whoops, I neglected to mention that data=ordered is now the default in >the patch. You can mount with -o data=writeback if you don't want >ordered data writes. > >-chris > > > > > > we just saw a benchmark in which data=ordered caused a major slowdown. Does this patch fix this? Edward and Elena, I want thorough benchmarking of this. -- Hans