From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rmap speedup
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 15:48:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D51A3C9.8CAABAA4@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E17cZBB-000503-00@starship
Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> ..
> > Not to mention the superfluous IO being scheduled today.
>
> Yes, well at this point we're suppose to demonstrate how much better
> rmap does on that, are we not.
Well let it be said that the 2.5.30 VM is by no means "Rik's
rmap VM". It's the 2.4.15 VM with pte-chains bolted on the side,
and it's fairly sucky in several regards.
Until the big stuff is settled in (locking rework, per-zone LRU,
slablru, ...) there's not a lot of point trying to finetune
the 2.5.30 VM.
But a convincing demonstration of the advantages of the 2.4 rmap
patch would set a lot of minds at ease ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-07 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-02 19:42 [PATCH] Rmap speedup Daniel Phillips
2002-08-02 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-02 21:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-03 0:14 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-03 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 0:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-08-03 0:56 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-03 3:47 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 5:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 18:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 21:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-03 22:49 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 23:55 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-08-04 0:47 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-04 1:01 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-04 14:11 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-04 14:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-08-04 16:55 ` Tobias Ringstrom
2002-08-03 23:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-04 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 21:05 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-03 21:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 21:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 21:24 ` [PATCH] Rmap speedup... call for testing Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 22:05 ` [PATCH] Rmap speedup Daniel Phillips
2002-08-03 22:39 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-03 22:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-04 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-05 0:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-05 7:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-05 13:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-05 13:57 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-05 18:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-07 18:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-07 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-07 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-07 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-07 20:51 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-07 20:54 ` Rik van Riel
2002-08-07 22:21 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-07 22:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-08-07 20:39 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D51A3C9.8CAABAA4@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@arcor.de \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.