All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PCI Cleanup
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 10:00:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D593B37.3070009@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1029250668.22847.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]

Alan Cox wrote:
> I pointed out before the null check was flawed. And all I see is the
> same identical patch churned out again. Regardless of whether that
> paticular stupid error was in the old code, not fixing it in the new
> code when its pointed out is a bit of a mess.
The NULL check has been removed.  The current version is attatched.  It now 
pulls out 75 lines of code.  I must have missed your complaints about the null 
check in previous emails...  The check was done in the old pci_conf1 funcs, and 
  not in the pci_conf2 ones.. I thought this was strange as well, but I just 
left them in...

> I'm not sure its a simplification either. More function pointers don't
> always make for neater - but thats a side issue. If the NULL check goes
> I'm not too worried about the other stuff.
I think that it is definitely a simplification, although I am a bit biased ;) 
It makes it easier for other configuration types to hook into the system as 
well (I'm partial to NUMA-Q as well ;).  All they have to do is hijack the 
pci_config_(read|write) function pointers.

Also, has anyone had a chance to look at it with pci_conf2?  I have no 
particular reason to believe it doesn't work, as the code paths are almost 
identical, I'd just be nice to have a confirmation.

Cheers!

-Matt

[-- Attachment #2: pci_fix-2531.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6738 bytes --]

diff -Nur linux-2.5.31-vanilla/arch/i386/pci/direct.c linux-2.5.31-patched/arch/i386/pci/direct.c
--- linux-2.5.31-vanilla/arch/i386/pci/direct.c	Sat Aug 10 18:41:23 2002
+++ linux-2.5.31-patched/arch/i386/pci/direct.c	Tue Aug 13 09:45:12 2002
@@ -69,76 +69,7 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
-
 #undef PCI_CONF1_ADDRESS
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
-{
-	int result; 
-	u32 data;
-
-	if (!value) 
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	result = pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, &data);
-
-	*value = (u8)data;
-
-	return result;
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
-{
-	int result; 
-	u32 data;
-
-	if (!value) 
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	result = pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, &data);
-
-	*value = (u16)data;
-
-	return result;
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_read_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
-{
-	if (!value) 
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	return pci_conf1_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
-{
-	return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
-{
-	return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, value);
-}
-
-static int pci_conf1_write_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
-{
-	return pci_conf1_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
-		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
-}
-
-static struct pci_ops pci_direct_conf1 = {
-	pci_conf1_read_config_byte,
-	pci_conf1_read_config_word,
-	pci_conf1_read_config_dword,
-	pci_conf1_write_config_byte,
-	pci_conf1_write_config_word,
-	pci_conf1_write_config_dword
-};
 
 
 /*
@@ -217,57 +149,58 @@
 
 #undef PCI_CONF2_ADDRESS
 
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
+
+static int pci_config_read_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 *value)
 {
 	int result; 
 	u32 data;
-	result = pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	result = pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, &data);
 	*value = (u8)data;
 	return result;
 }
 
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
+static int pci_config_read_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 *value)
 {
 	int result; 
 	u32 data;
-	result = pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	result = pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, &data);
 	*value = (u16)data;
 	return result;
 }
 
-static int pci_conf2_read_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
+static int pci_config_read_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 *value)
 {
-	return pci_conf2_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	return pci_config_read(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
 }
 
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
+static int pci_config_write_byte(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u8 value)
 {
-	return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 1, value);
 }
 
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
+static int pci_config_write_word(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u16 value)
 {
-	return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 2, value);
 }
 
-static int pci_conf2_write_config_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
+static int pci_config_write_dword(struct pci_dev *dev, int where, u32 value)
 {
-	return pci_conf2_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
+	return pci_config_write(0, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 
 		PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn), where, 4, value);
 }
 
-static struct pci_ops pci_direct_conf2 = {
-	pci_conf2_read_config_byte,
-	pci_conf2_read_config_word,
-	pci_conf2_read_config_dword,
-	pci_conf2_write_config_byte,
-	pci_conf2_write_config_word,
-	pci_conf2_write_config_dword
+static struct pci_ops pci_direct = {
+	pci_config_read_byte,
+	pci_config_read_word,
+	pci_config_read_dword,
+	pci_config_write_byte,
+	pci_config_write_word,
+	pci_config_write_dword
 };
 
 
@@ -301,7 +235,7 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct pci_ops * __devinit pci_check_direct(void)
+static int __init pci_direct_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned int tmp;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -312,17 +246,21 @@
 	 * Check if configuration type 1 works.
 	 */
 	if (pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_CONF1) {
+		pci_config_read = pci_conf1_read;
+		pci_config_write = pci_conf1_write;
 		outb (0x01, 0xCFB);
 		tmp = inl (0xCF8);
 		outl (0x80000000, 0xCF8);
 		if (inl (0xCF8) == 0x80000000 &&
-		    pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct_conf1)) {
+		    pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct)) {
 			outl (tmp, 0xCF8);
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
 			printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using configuration type 1\n");
 			if (!request_region(0xCF8, 8, "PCI conf1"))
-				return NULL;
-			return &pci_direct_conf1;
+				pci_root_ops = NULL;
+			else
+				pci_root_ops = &pci_direct;
+			return 0;
 		}
 		outl (tmp, 0xCF8);
 	}
@@ -331,36 +269,25 @@
 	 * Check if configuration type 2 works.
 	 */
 	if (pci_probe & PCI_PROBE_CONF2) {
+		pci_config_read = pci_conf2_read;
+		pci_config_write = pci_conf2_write;
 		outb (0x00, 0xCFB);
 		outb (0x00, 0xCF8);
 		outb (0x00, 0xCFA);
 		if (inb (0xCF8) == 0x00 && inb (0xCFA) == 0x00 &&
-		    pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct_conf2)) {
+		    pci_sanity_check(&pci_direct)) {
 			local_irq_restore(flags);
 			printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using configuration type 2\n");
 			if (!request_region(0xCF8, 4, "PCI conf2"))
-				return NULL;
-			return &pci_direct_conf2;
+				pci_root_ops = NULL;
+			else
+				pci_root_ops = &pci_direct;
+			return 0;
 		}
 	}
 
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
-	return NULL;
-}
-
-static int __init pci_direct_init(void)
-{
-	if ((pci_probe & (PCI_PROBE_CONF1 | PCI_PROBE_CONF2)) 
-		&& (pci_root_ops = pci_check_direct())) {
-		if (pci_root_ops == &pci_direct_conf1) {
-			pci_config_read = pci_conf1_read;
-			pci_config_write = pci_conf1_write;
-		}
-		else {
-			pci_config_read = pci_conf2_read;
-			pci_config_write = pci_conf2_write;
-		}
-	}
+	pci_root_ops = NULL;
 	return 0;
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-13 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-13  0:08 [patch] PCI Cleanup Matthew Dobson
2002-08-13 11:45 ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 14:17   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 14:57     ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 15:15       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 17:00       ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2002-08-13 17:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 19:57           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 20:13             ` Alan Cox
2002-08-13 20:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-13 22:29                 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-13 22:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-08-14  0:57                     ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-15  0:23                     ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-14  7:08               ` Martin Mares
2002-08-13 14:55   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-13 15:07     ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-15  2:24 Grover, Andrew
2002-08-15  7:49 ` Martin Mares
2002-08-15 15:58 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-08-15 16:36   ` Greg KH
2002-08-16 22:34     ` Greg KH
2002-08-19 23:41       ` Matthew Dobson
2002-08-15 18:28 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-08-15 20:23 Grover, Andrew
2002-08-15 20:54 ` Patrick Mochel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D593B37.3070009@us.ibm.com \
    --to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.