From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.15]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E656C4829 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 21:32:24 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3D5F157A.7070207@charter.net> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 23:33:14 -0400 From: "B. Douglas Hilton" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Seltenreich Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] PCI Intel EtherExpressPro100 strangeness on C200 machine. References: <3D5EB2D6.9090403@charter.net> <20020817223713.GA25852@gate450.dyndns.org> <3D5EFFF7.30008@charter.net> <20020818031227.GA32603@gate450.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Yes I made a monolithic kernel, so it rebuilt eepro100.c Prior, I was using a stock Debian vmlinux-2.4.18-32 kernel so there is a good chance that the Debian packager had made the same modification to the source. Andreas Seltenreich wrote: > * B. Douglas Hilton [2002-08-18 04:01]: > >>I tried your suggestions and built a new kernel, but >>it still behaves as it did prior to the modification. > > > Just to be sure, you did rebuild the eepro100 module too? > > I'm using the nic for hours now and it is working perfectly. > Hmmm.... > >>To summarize (with eepro100 in PCI slot ): >> >> - can ping using a dotted quad >> - cannot ping using dns >> - can ftp login to another machine on my LAN >> - when I try to list files or download it locks up. > > > With the original module (2.4.19-pa2) I wasn't able to receive ip packets > larger than approx 150 bytes. For example a ping -s 100 went through > while ping -s 200 didn't. > > >>This is a major headache. I don't believe that the Debian 3.0 >>cdrom will boot on the C200, and without network I can't >>upgrade the 0.9.3 cdrom. Its a catch-22! > > > Btw. the diff was from 2.4.19-pa2. Maybe there have been other changes > if you are using an older kernel. > I guess I will try that one then. Thanks. > The address of the maintainer Andrey V. Savochkin > seems to be broken. So no help from there. > > regards > andreas >