From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Corruption: --fix-fixable results in all nlink
 values = 0
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:42:11 +0400
Message-ID: <3D60AF63.6040809@namesys.com>
References: <200208152007.42370.degerrit@web.de> <200208152329.40707.degerrit@web.de> <200208161205.00550.vitaly@namesys.com> <200208170254.48383.degerrit@web.de> <m3k7mpreij.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <3D5E9D69.1030109@namesys.com> <20020819092023.B1815@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11227-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: Matthias Andree <ma+rfs@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, god@namesys.com, mason <mason@namesys.com>

Oleg Drokin wrote:

>Hello!
>
>On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 11:00:57PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Nikita wrote a badblocks patch.
>>The main reason for resisting doing it is that it is usually better to 
>>just write to the bad block, and let the hard drive remap the block.
>>
>>Oleg, maybe send it into 2.5?
>>    
>>
>
>I think I have somewhat better patch and reiserfsck is also prepared for that
>(disabled at compile time, though).
>The only thing is we had not agreed on unused key to put list of badblocks into
>and Chris does not agree that we have store such an info on FS.
>
What is his argument?

>
>I will prepare a patch for 2.5.
>
>Bye,
>    Oleg
>
>
>  
>