From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaju Abraham Subject: Buffer_size divided into more than 32 frags. Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:15:55 +0530 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3D646C83.95E62185@multitech.co.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mtsslvpngway ([202.54.39.98]) by alsa.alsa-project.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id GAA10670 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 06:48:27 +0200 Received: from multitech.co.in (atmesh [192.168.1.46]) by multitech.co.in (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g7M4ndUZ001779 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:19:39 +0530 Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Alsa-Developers List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi all, Can frags may be more than the number of bds available i.e 32 ? If yes, does it follow that both of the following cases are possible. i) the whole buffer (of size buffer_size ) can be divided between 32 bds so that a given bd will always point to same address during the course of emptying the buffer ii) If I force the fragment size to be small, the big buffer_size can be get divided into more than 32 frags. So a given bd will be pointing to different places in the buffer during the course of emptying the buffer. Thanx, --Shaju ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390