From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Re: Corruption: --fix-fixable results in all nlink Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:55:36 +0400 Message-ID: <3D64D138.50408@namesys.com> References: <200208220002.17391.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <18954880703.20020822001139@tnonline.net> <3D64B980.1060909@namesys.com> <000d01c249c6$39d38170$2ad22fc2@acealex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Alexander Saers Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Alexander Saers wrote: >And sometimes you are using old disks (20 gb or so) that has around 500kb of >bad blocks. They dont have warranty and i think it would be a waste to just >trow them away. > >/Alexander > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Hans Reiser" >To: "Anders Widman" >Cc: "ReiserFS List" >Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 12:14 PM >Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Corruption: --fix-fixable results in all >nlink > > > > >>Anders Widman wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Why not get rid of the "bad block" thing one for all. >>>>If a current SCSI or ATA disk show bad blocks (the remapping do not work >>>> >>>> >any > > >>>>longer) replace the disk! The manufacturer have to replace it if the >>>> >>>> >warranty > > >>>>didn't expired. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Bad Block relocation is nothing that really can be trusted, on either >>>IDE nor SCSI drives. User wants their filesystem to be robust and >>>safe, even if the drive has damaged blocks. Many filesystems, >>>including very old ones has bad blocks handling, and it has saved many >>>people from troubles too. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-Dieter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Sometimes you can't replace the drive immediately (e.g. laptop while >>traveling abroad), and then it is useful to have badblocks handling. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > The cost of losing data due to more blocks going bad is usually much more than the cost of the drives....