From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: corrupted 3.5 format fs
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:29:26 +0400
Message-ID: <3D64D926.7060600@namesys.com>
References: <20020822063512.54daaeaf.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <20020822094356.A1660@namesys.com> <200208221555.25020.vitaly@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11290-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
Cc: Philippe Gramoull? <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Vitaly Fertman wrote:

>On Thursday 22 August 2002 09:43, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello!
>>
>>On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 06:35:12AM +0200, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>So , i did and re-ran --check and came with still 1 corruption left that
>>>was said to be able to be corrected with --fix-fixable.
>>>Re-ran --fix-fixable and --check , and i still had this '1 corruption
>>>found which can be fixed with --fix-fixable'
>>>bad_stat_data: block 38372, [3955 5371 0x0 SD (0)], SD has bad nlink
>>>number
>>>      
>>>
>
>Yes, the idea to fix nlinks on fix-fixable has some problems and we decided
>to leave it for rebuild-tree as it was before.
>
>  
>
It seems to me you have a UI bug here, and until you fix those problems 
you need to tell users that it requires a --rebuild-tree to be fixed.

Hans