From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:29:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D81F64B.11182FB1@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020912.163447.131926830.davem@redhat.com
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Bonding does not help with single stream performance.
> You have to have multiple apps generating multiple streams
> of data before you'll realize any improvement.
> Therefore netpipe is a bad test for what you're doing.
This has always confused me. Why doesn't the bonding driver try and spread all the traffic over all
the links? This would allow for a single stream to use the full aggregate bandwidth of all bonded
links.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-13 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-12 18:39 bonding vs 802.3ad/Cisco EtherChannel link agregation Boris Protopopov
2002-09-12 23:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 14:29 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2002-09-13 22:22 ` Cacophonix
2002-09-16 13:23 ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-16 16:09 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-16 19:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:10 ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-16 21:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:22 ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-16 21:17 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-17 10:16 ` jamal
2002-09-17 16:43 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-18 1:07 ` jamal
2002-09-18 4:06 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-18 11:48 ` jamal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-13 1:30 Feldman, Scott
2002-09-13 14:50 ` Boris Protopopov
2002-09-16 20:12 Yan-Fa Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D81F64B.11182FB1@nortelnetworks.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.