From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time]
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:07:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D893165.10106@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020918.182855.47438220.davem@redhat.com
David S. Miller wrote:
> It's hash lookup code, nearly identical to ipv4 version except
> it's dealing with 128-bit IP addresses instead of 32-bit.
>
> You give up way too easily, which leads me to belive you'll disappear
> just as easily if complicated bugs stop popping up as a result of your
> changes.
I'll maintain this patch for myself if no one else, so I will not
go away. But, since I am new to this code, and do not have a test
setup to test the ipv6 changes, I was hesitant. I can at the least
patch it how I think it should be and test that ipv4 still works and
it compiles. If you or someone else can do more profound testing on
it, then that would be great.
> The #ifdefs were per request, I personally would like them not to be there
> either. As far as I can tell, the changes are backwards compatible, so there
> should be no need for ifdefs.
>
> I mean put the ifdefs in a header file such as tcp.h, not in the *.c
> code.
Would you object to me just removing all of them and having the patch
unconditionally compiled in?
> I don't require you to test the ipv6 portions, I will be able to
> eyeball them and know if they are right or not, this is how simple
> the ipv6 version of the tcp bits will be.
Ok, I'll work up a patch with the ipv6 support and try to get that
out sometime next week.
Thanks,
Ben
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-19 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 6:47 [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self Ben Greear
2002-09-18 6:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 6:53 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-18 7:09 ` [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this time] Ben Greear
2002-09-18 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 23:20 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-19 1:28 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-19 2:07 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2002-09-19 2:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-19 3:04 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 1:00 ` [PATCH] Networking: send-to-self [link to non-broken patch this kuznet
2002-09-27 1:30 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 3:36 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 6:33 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 15:01 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 15:40 ` Ben Greear
2002-09-27 15:46 ` kuznet
2002-09-27 15:53 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D893165.10106@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.