From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jose Santiago <jsantiago@chrysalisdev.com>
Subject: RPC request reserved 240 but used 244
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:24:37 -0500
Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <3D8F1615.5000606@chrysalisdev.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Return-path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net>
Received: from 89.levincom.com ([198.78.56.89] helo=chrysalis-sbs1.chrysalisdev.com)
	by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
	id 17tTCm-0003Z4-00
	for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:24:52 -0700
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Help: <mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development,
	interoperability,
	and testing. <nfs.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs>,
	<mailto:nfs-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchives/forum.php?forum=nfs>

I am seeing messages similar to the following in my kernel log since I 
upgraded to 2.4.19. I have installed Trond's NFS_ALL patches and the 
linux-2.4.19-30-neilb.dif patch from Trond's NFS patches site. Is this 
something I need to worry about?



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs