From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: G@thunk.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:44:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9C9E39.6090804@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021003194049.GA16329@think.thunk.org
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:04:12PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>No they don't. Average space wastage is more than 50% because sysadmins
>>have to be conservative.
>>
>>
>
>Sure, but even a hundred megabytes or two out of a 100 gigabyte drive
>is cheap. (Specifically, about fifty cents' worth.)
>
> - Ted
>
>
>
>
Usual space wastage is on the order of 5% of total partition size, yes?
Allocating 0.1% of your drive for inodes will get you into trouble if a
user does something like use mh or read news, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-03 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 19:59 [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 20:49 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-01 21:17 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-01 21:31 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 20:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-01 21:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-02 10:48 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 16:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-03 0:37 ` [Ext2-devel] " Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 12:04 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-03 19:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2002-10-03 19:44 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2002-10-04 15:53 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-04 17:09 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2002-10-07 6:54 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-10 0:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-01 21:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-10-02 16:38 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-10-02 6:39 ` Nikita Danilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9C9E39.6090804@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=G@thunk.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.