From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abramo Bagnara Subject: Re: Why do I get broken pipe on write to a pcm in statePREPARED? Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 20:04:00 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3D9DD810.7C3960C4@libero.it> References: <200209181957.g8IJvS008300@d1o87.telia.com> <200210040814.g948E9015465@d1o87.telia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Anders Torger , Jaroslav Kysela , Tim Goetze , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:14:09 +0200, > Anders Torger wrote: > > > > Uhhh... I guess ignoring me works just as well :-) > > not ignored but pending :) > > Abramo, do you still have objection to change the default behavior? > > i don't mind that even the new behavior is optional e.g. via > snd_pcm_sw_params. but i believe the current behavior is not expected > as a normal one, so it's enough reason to change it. > > also, if someone (Tim?) already has a patch, please send it here. > it seems my last patch doesn't work properly... For what it worths my objections are still there. I'm strongly convinced that to have poll waiting for something that cannot happens is a big mistake (also as an optional behaviour). That apart I'm sure that to make a change in actual behaviour between rcX and 1.0 is a professional suicide. However it's _your_ professional suicide so... ;-))) To resume, if you ask me, the answer is no. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo.bagnara@libero.it Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf