From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@cox.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2?
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:03:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9E020E.9070703@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021004204851.26027.qmail@web40020.mail.yahoo.com
Brad Chapman wrote:
> I'm going to be installing RH8 soon, and would like to know if gcc 3.2
> miscompiles 2.4 kernel code (i.e. 2.4.20-pre8, for example). Are there any
> problems with the code that gcc 3.2 produces from kernel source?
>
> Brad
>
I have a system that's been running 2.4.20-preX compiled with GCC 3.2
for over a month now, no problems so far.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-04 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 20:48 Any problems with 2.4 and gcc 3.2? Brad Chapman
2002-10-04 21:03 ` Kevin P. Fleming [this message]
2002-10-05 0:37 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9E020E.9070703@cox.net \
--to=kpfleming@cox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.