From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@tac.ch>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: TCP window tracking patch status query for further design considerations
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 14:08:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA2CAB4.1030005@tac.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.33.0210081210410.23021-100000@blackhole.kfki.hu
Hi,
Thank you very much for your reply.
> The problem hasn't still been investigated. :-( I have been totally buried
> with other tasks in the last weeks. :-((
I understand that. All good people are buried in work.
> I hope in this month I'll be able to run an excessive testing of the
> delayed SMTP delivery caused by the patch and find the solution.
If I can be of any help, let me know. I can run some tests in my lab since I
have to test this patch anyway. I currently work with packet generation tools to
send specially crafted IP packets to see if I can evade some functionality.
At least it seems to be quite stable so far. The only problem I'm experiencing
is the interaction of the TCP state transition table modification influence when
using LVS. In LVS we have done a similar state transition definition but IIRC it
differs from yours. So now we have proc-fs exports for TCP state transition
timing with your window tracking patch and proc-fs exports for the same timing
entries from LVS.
> Even after the problem is fixed, some time will be required for further
> testing the patch before considering submitting into the kernel. Also,
> a decision will be required on the the proc interface of netfilter due to
> the new level introduced by the patch.
Let me know when you work on it again so I can maybe help you. I see that your
patch does break some user space scripts that assume certain proc-fs entries for
the conntrack_max variable. I hope though that nevertheless the netfilter team
will be working on a future inclusion of this patch.
Thanks a bunch for your time,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-08 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-07 15:56 TCP window tracking patch status query for further design considerations Roberto Nibali
2002-10-08 10:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2002-10-08 12:08 ` Roberto Nibali [this message]
2002-10-08 13:55 ` Roberto Nibali
2002-10-08 22:16 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2002-10-08 22:22 ` Roberto Nibali
2002-10-09 13:20 ` Roberto Nibali
2002-10-08 14:55 ` Roberto Nibali
2002-10-08 22:32 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2002-10-08 23:15 ` Roberto Nibali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA2CAB4.1030005@tac.ch \
--to=ratz@tac.ch \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.