From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manuel Krause <manuel.krause@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs
 on 2.5.40-mm1
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 22:31:46 +0200
Message-ID: <3DA340B2.5000605@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
References: <200210042254.23978.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> 	<20021004220126.GB3000@clusterfs.com> <1033996342.13900.383.camel@tiny>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11620-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On 10/07/2002 03:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:01, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> 
>>On Oct 04, 2002  22:54 +0200, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
>>
>>>Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 10:48 schrieb Paul P Komkoff Jr:
>>>
[...]
> 
> The data logging patches have a bunch of other metadata writeback
> optimizations.  It helps most for small transactions, but improves
> things for all metadata workloads.  Updated 2.4.20-preX patches should
> finally go out today, and then I'll start on 2.5
                  ^^^^^                                   ?

Sorry, Chris & list!

Somehow, I don't like these kinds of announcements<->reality relation 
@reiserfs-list until now. These patches have been announced 2 weeks ago 
already, IIRC.

Mmh. If I didn't follow my announced timelines, I would keep getting 
serious problems here... ;-)  How Do _you_ solve this? Any hints?!


But, best wishes for your "hidden" work, Chris, I still believe...

Manuel