From: Brendan J Simon <brendan.simon@bigpond.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-devel <kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 00:14:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA439B2.3000801@bigpond.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.44.0210091546070.8911-100000@serv
Roman Zippel wrote:
>>Well, my basic preference is
>>
>>* something other than Config.new (the original name in your config system)
>>* something other than Config.in
>>
>>I think it is a mistake to name a totally different format the same name
>>as an older format... even "config.in" would be better than "Config.in"...
>>
>>
>
>My first plan was to use Config.in, but I can't overwrite the old files
>yet, so I named it Config.new. Personally I only prefer that it starts
>with a capital letter (like Makefile, Readme), so it's at the top of a
>dir listing, but otherwise I don't care much about the name.
>
Simple and boring but how about "Config2.in" or "Config-2.in" ???
Regards,
Brendan Simon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-09 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210081830350.4396-100000@home.transmeta.com>
2002-10-09 12:01 ` linux kernel conf 0.8 Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 13:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 13:55 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 14:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 14:14 ` Brendan J Simon [this message]
2002-10-09 14:28 ` [kbuild-devel] " Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 14:24 ` Brendan J Simon
2002-10-09 14:34 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 14:45 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-10-09 15:14 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 15:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 15:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 16:29 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-09 18:39 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 18:52 ` Peter Samuelson
2002-10-09 19:28 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 19:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 19:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-09 14:55 ` [kbuild-devel] " Roman Zippel
2002-10-09 17:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 17:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 18:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-09 19:26 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 20:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-09 22:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-10-10 14:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-10 17:29 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-10 17:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-10 17:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-10-09 23:49 ` [kbuild-devel] " Brendan J Simon
2002-10-09 18:35 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DA439B2.3000801@bigpond.com \
--to=brendan.simon@bigpond.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.