From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:02:59 +0400 Message-ID: <3DA5C0D3.4000503@namesys.com> References: <001b01c26fff$26d23850$0101a8c0@bummer> <20021010165854.4381ed7e.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <3DA5B971.3040400@namesys.com> <20021010195338.138dffcf.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Philippe_Gramoull=E9?= Cc: teodarren@myrealbox.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Philippe Gramoull=E9 wrote: >Hi, > >Yes, that's what i meant by "not *out of the box* snapshots". > >We quite never played with LVM as it adds another software layer and i did= n't feel >it was mature enough at the time we put everything in production but given= the benefits >we might want to give it a try. > >BTW, Hans, what you would recommand : LVM or EVMS ? > >Thanks, > >Philippe > > >On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:31:29 +0400 >Hans Reiser wrote: > > | >Netapp as well have tons of features that linux boxes +PV210S can't= do :Clustering > | >volume copy, out out the box snapshots,etc.. > | > > | Linux has snapshots if you use lvm, but it is true that Netapp make= s a=20 > | good product. > > > =20 > I lack the expertise to advise on this. There has been a lot of=20 controversy on this. Keep an eye out for lvm2 to come out. Hans