All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adharsh Praveen R <adarsh@multitech.co.in>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Vs pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch]
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:06:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DA6553B.FFA4A75D@multitech.co.in> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3051 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]

hai

I am new to the list and new to iptables. Please forgive me if I sound
stupid.

I would like to know the differences between pptp-conntrack-nat.patch
and

pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch.

I am trying to apply these patches to my 2.4.18 kernel.

I am using iptables-1.2.6a.

I applied pptp-conntrack-nat.patch first to the kernel.

Later I tried appling pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch.

when I try to compile the kernel after saying make menuconfig and make
bzImage,

make install, the compilation fails in make modules.

saying

structure has no member named 'master' in ip_conntrack_pptp.c

structure has no member named 'list' in ip_conntrack_pptp.c

(This is for the structure ip_ct_pptp )

when I check the file, the structure has a member called slave.

pptp-conntrack-nat.patch wants a member called master in the structure.

where as pptp-gre-ct-nat-0.83.patch adds a member called slave in the
structure.

Can I apply these two patches together or any one of them is enough

for PPTP to function with NAT.

Can anyone enlighten me on this?

Thanks in advance.

regards,
adharsh.

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1249 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2002-10-11  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DA6553B.FFA4A75D@multitech.co.in \
    --to=adarsh@multitech.co.in \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.