From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Shirkey Subject: Re: 1.0.0 Requirements, Integration of sound deamon (JACK) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:03:11 +0900 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3DA6E82F.4070302@boosthardware.com> References: <20021011131309.46309.qmail@web40613.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: David Sankel Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org David Sankel wrote: > Hello ALSA developers, > > I was wondering if there is a requirement list for > 1.0.0 release of ALSA. If not, what would be expected > in a 1.0.0 release? (I've got a few brain/cpu cycles > to spare towards a 1.0.0 release) > > I know the topic of sound deamons has really been > stomped in the ground, but I haven't found any > information about the possible inclusion of the JACK > sound deamon into an alsa release. Since running JACK > does not lock up any of the sound device files, all > non-JACK-aware programs will act normally while the > deamon is running. > Have you used JACK? AFAIK it definitely requires a pcm. You may have used it on hardware that supports multiopen which would explain what you have observed. -- Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd. For the discerning hardware connoisseur Http://www.boosthardware.com Http://www.djcj.org - The Linux Audio Users guide ======================================== "Um...symbol_get and symbol_put... They're kindof like does anyone remember like get_symbol and put_symbol I think we used to have..." - Rusty Russell in his talk on the module subsystem ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf