From: Daniele Lugli <genlogic@inrete.it>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: unhappy with current.h
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:46:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAB1F00.667B82B5@inrete.it> (raw)
I recently wrote a kernel module which gave me some mysterious problems.
After too many days spent in blood, sweat and tears, I found the cause:
*** one of my data structures has a field named 'current'. ***
Pretty common word, isn't it? Would you think it can cause such a
trouble? But in some of my files I happen to indirectly include
<asm/current.h> (kernel 2.4.18 for i386), containing the following line:
#define current get_current()
so that my structure becomes the owner of a function it has never asked
for, while it looses a data member. gcc has nothing to complain about
that.
In some other files I don't happen to include <asm/current.h>, so that
there my structure is sound - but alas! has different size and different
composition. Again, gcc has nothing to complain.
Moral of the story: in my opinion kernel developers should reduce to a
minimum the use of #define, and preferably use words in uppercase and/or
with underscores, in any case not commonly used words.
In the specific case the said #define just looks to save 6 keystrokes
and I think it could have been completely avoided.
Regards, Daniele Lugli
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 19:46 Daniele Lugli [this message]
2002-10-14 19:52 ` unhappy with current.h David S. Miller
2002-10-14 20:18 ` Daniele Lugli
2002-10-14 20:24 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-10-15 0:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-15 1:05 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-10-15 1:12 ` Murray J. Root
2002-10-15 14:11 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-10-15 20:29 ` Daniele Lugli
2002-10-15 20:44 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-15 21:01 ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-10-14 20:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-14 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 20:37 ` Olivier Galibert
2002-10-15 18:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-14 21:22 ` Daniele Lugli
2002-10-15 17:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-10-14 20:45 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-15 1:09 ` Chris Wedgwood
[not found] <20021014.161535.17120.336861@webmail4.nyc.untd.com>
2002-10-14 20:24 ` Daniele Lugli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-18 14:49 Jeffrey Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAB1F00.667B82B5@inrete.it \
--to=genlogic@inrete.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.