From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3DAB2EE8.2040900@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:54:00 -0500 From: Mark Hatle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Binary Compatibility of various flavors of PPC References: <20021014204900.BD7B3FAA5@denx.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <3DAB2923.3060607@mvista.com> Mark Hatle wrote: > >>IMHO it is a bad practice to mix and match userspace between 403/8xx, 405, and >>7xx/74xx/82xx series of processors. It is just asking for problems.. but it >>definatly can be done given proper resources and understanding of the underlying >>problems. > > > A lot of things _can_ be done. But do all these things make sense > (technically and commercially)? Hehe if ya want to pay me a million dollars (or more) I'll be happy to make it work.. ;) But I still won't recommend it to anyone. The answer to this is understand what you are getting yourself into and understand that you are probably costing yourself much more over the short and long term to use a "common" set of binaries then to use binaries tailored for the specific CPU that you are using. --Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/