All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:07:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DABBEB9.7040004@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DABAACE.9040706@us.ibm.com

Dave Hansen wrote:

> 
> I get some strange e1000 failures too.  It usually involves the watchdog 
> kicking them back into order, but sometimes they'll stay offline for a 
> while.  Heat would explain it, though, because it only happens when I'm 
> actually using the cards for a benchmark.  I figured that it was either 
> my cables, or a shoddy switch.
> 
> The new dual-port e1000 that I have doesn't seem to have this problem, 
> even though I'm running 4 times more traffic than the singles that I had.

That was exactly the behaviour I noticed.  I believe it's because when you
run two side-by-side, they cook each other (I'm assuming you didn't run
2 2-ports side-by-side)

Try strapping a fan on them somehow and I bet all your troubles go
away (and maybe your .ibm email will shame Intel into putting heat-sinks
and/or small fans on their NICs... ;)

(I ran two Netgear 302t NICs (tigon-3) side-by-side for 4 days at max speed, and they
  didn't drop a single packet, even though their heat-sinks were too hot to
  touch!)

Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear



  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-15  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-15  2:20 Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) Feldman, Scott
2002-10-15  2:37 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-15  2:54   ` Jonathan Lundell
2002-10-15  5:42 ` Dave Hansen
2002-10-15  7:07   ` Ben Greear [this message]
2002-10-15  7:01 ` Ben Greear
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-06  7:33 Feldman, Scott
2002-10-08 18:44 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-06  3:38 Ben Greear
2002-10-06  3:47 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-10-06 22:38   ` jamal
2002-10-07  0:14     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-10-07 11:56       ` jamal
2002-10-07  3:46     ` Ben Greear
2002-10-07  5:26       ` David S. Miller
2002-10-07 11:53       ` jamal
2002-10-07 11:58         ` David S. Miller
2002-10-07 16:40         ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DABBEB9.7040004@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.