From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:43:04 +0400
Message-ID: <3DAC1B68.6050103@namesys.com>
References: <200210121052.22603.bofh@coker.com.au> <200210142252.09438.bofh@coker.com.au> <20021014225812.GA11337@tapu.f00f.org> <200210151457.58520.bofh@coker.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11695-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Russell Coker <bofh@coker.com.au>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Russell Coker wrote:

>See the following graph:
>http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/hardware/46g.png
>
>This shows testing a single 46G drive, two drives on different buses at the 
>same time, and two drives on the same bus at the same time.  zcav (part of 
>Bonnie++) was used to perform the tests.
>
>  
>

How many CPUs in this test?