From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:20:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:20:48 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:48100 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:20:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3DAC79FA.5D7A8651@digeo.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:26:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: mkanand@us.ibm.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhartner@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: context switches increased in 2.5.40 kernel References: <3DAC7023.68FEB8A7@us.ibm.com> <20021015.131458.29964525.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2002 20:26:34.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[27EAB530:01C27489] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Mala Anand > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:44:35 -0500 > > Does this have anything to do with tcp_wakeup patch? > > Please do not mention patches by name, this tells > me nothing. What "tcp_wakeup patch" are you talking > about? That would be the patch which uses prepare_to_wait/finish_wait in networking. It sped up specweb by 2%, btw. But that is not present in 2.5.40, and has not been in -mm since 2.5.40-mm1. I assume it wasn't present in Mala's testing.