From: Michael Clark <michael@metaparadigm.com>
To: GrandMasterLee <masterlee@digitalroadkill.net>
Cc: J Sloan <joe@tmsusa.com>, Simon Roscic <simon.roscic@chello.at>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel 2.5] Qlogic 2x00 driver
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:59:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAD0E36.9040809@metaparadigm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1034750930.2045.35.camel@localhost
On 10/16/02 14:48, GrandMasterLee wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 01:40, Michael Clark wrote:
> ...
>
>>>Should I remove LVM all together, or just not use it? In your opinion.
>>
>>I just didn't load the module after migrating my volumes. If the problem
>>is a stack problem, then its probably not necessarily a bug in LVM
>>- just the combination of it, ext3 and the qlogic driver don't mix well
>>- so if its not being used, then it won't be increasing the stack footprint.
>
> Not to be dense, but it's compiled into my kernel, that's why I ask. We
> try not to use modules where we can help it. So I'm thinking, if no VG
> are actively used, then LVM won't affect the stack much. I just don't
> know if that's true or not.
Correct. Won't effect the stack at all.
~mc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-16 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-15 19:20 [Kernel 2.5] Qlogic 2x00 driver Simon Roscic
2002-10-15 19:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-15 19:53 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-16 2:51 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 3:56 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 4:30 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 4:35 ` J Sloan
2002-10-16 4:43 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:03 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 6:31 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:40 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 6:48 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 6:59 ` Michael Clark [this message]
2002-10-16 4:58 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 5:28 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 5:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-17 1:59 ` Andrew Vasquez
2002-10-17 2:44 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 3:11 ` Andrew Vasquez
2002-10-17 3:42 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 9:40 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-18 6:45 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 16:28 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-16 16:49 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-17 3:12 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 3:54 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-17 4:08 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 5:03 ` Michael Clark
2002-10-16 5:02 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-16 16:38 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-17 3:08 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-17 17:47 ` Simon Roscic
2002-10-18 6:42 ` GrandMasterLee
2002-10-18 15:11 ` Simon Roscic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-19 2:17 rwhron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAD0E36.9040809@metaparadigm.com \
--to=michael@metaparadigm.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@tmsusa.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masterlee@digitalroadkill.net \
--cc=simon.roscic@chello.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.