From: "G.de-With" <G.de-With@herts.ac.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: I/O performance test
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:58:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAE89B1.F58E90C3@herts.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DAE162D.D36EB07A@herts.ac.uk
Hello
Since a month we have a LINUX BEOWULF cluster, the clusters contains 7
P4 dual processor 2GHz computers, with 8Gb of RAM per machine. For our
network we have used Gigabit ethernet. On our cluster we are running RH
7.2, with Linux 2.4.19.
These are some of the hardware specs:
- Dual Intel Xeon 2.GHz, 512 cache 400 MHz FSB
- 8 Gb ECC DDR
- Fujitsu 72Gb 10.000 rpm Ultra 160 SCA HDD SCSI HARDDISK
The problem we have with our cluster is as follows. When running large
scientific simulations the computer performance gradually goes down as
the I/O activity is increasing. At some point the response of the
computer is so poor that we have to kill the simulation. In a worst case
when the simulation was running overnight the computer hangs and a reset
of the computer is necessary. Nevertheless, even when we manage to kill
the simulation in time the computer remains very slow and a reboot is
necessary to regain full computer power.
My first suspicion was that the computer simply started swapping, but
there is no swap space being used, instead free RAM memory is still
apparent
(between 5-10%) and only 90% of the RAM is in use whereby 50% is cached
and another 50% is in usage. In addition the cpu usage is very low as
well.
To investigate the I/O performance I installed an I/O performance
benchmark program called bonnie++. The first test I performed was a
single bonnie++ -s 16096 instance.
# bonnie++ -s 16096
Unfortunately, as a result of running bonnie++ the computer started to
slow down till it finally hang. All the symptoms I discover with
bonnie++ are identical to what I experience when running our scientific
calculations.
In order to improve the I/O performance I have add some patches to the
kernel, including the patch for 00_block-highmem-all-19-1, to avoid
bounce buffers. Unfortunately none of the patches let to any improvement
in the I/O performance.
I don't think the machine should be behaving like this. I certainly
expect some slowdowns with that much IO, but the computer should still
be reasonably responsive, particularly because no system or user files
that need to be accessed are on that channel of the SCSI controller.
As a sort of a desperate move I did two other test in addition which
could be of use to the understanding of the problem:
- I removed 6Gb from the server and run the test bonnie++ -s 16096
succesfully with 2Gb of RAM.
- I placed an IDE disk 40Gb and run the test bonnie++ -s 16096 with 8Gb
of RAM succesfully.
Any advice on approaching this problem would be appreciated.
Govert
--
------------------------------------------------------------
| Dr. Govert de With Research Fellow |
| Fluid Mechanics Research Group |
| University of Hertfordshire |
| Tel: 01707 284124 Fax: 01707 285086 |
------------------------------------------------------------
| Der Horizont vieler Menschen ist ein Kreis mit Radius Null |
| und das nennen sie ihren Standpunkt. |
------------------------------------------------------------
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-17 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200209260854.g8Q8s1403660@blueraja.scyld.com>
[not found] ` <3D9316D4.28D4904D@herts.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <3DAD8DA3.95DBD7C5@herts.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <3DAD91C0.B8FC2B4C@herts.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <3DADB02B.3725A191@herts.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <3DAE162D.D36EB07A@herts.ac.uk>
2002-10-17 9:58 ` G.de-With [this message]
2002-10-17 10:48 ` I/O performance test Pasi Kärkkäinen
2002-10-17 21:14 ` Roger Larsson
2002-10-18 8:56 ` G.de-With
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DAE89B1.F58E90C3@herts.ac.uk \
--to=g.de-with@herts.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.