From: Kevin Brosius <cobra@compuserve.com>
To: kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Olien <dmo@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] (was Re: [2.5.43] (DAC960 compile failure))
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:11:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB14BED.722CFB06@compuserve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DAEDBFA.6A8A169B@kns.com
Dave, all,
Dave and I have made the 2.5.43 patch available for download. You can
find it on my page at:
http://www.user1.netcarrier.com/~kbrosius/pages/mylex.html
This patch allows me to boot 2.5.43 on a dual Athlon system with a Mylex
eXtremeRAID 2000 controller successfully.
Thanks Dave!
Kevin
>
> Hi Dave,
> I'll give it a shot tonight. Did you post the patch to the
> linux-kernel mailing list? I can't find it in the archives. If not,
> would you mail a copy to my home address (compuserve, or have you posted
> it on a web location?) If you'd like me to put up copies of the patch
> for general consumption I'll make space available on a web page.
>
> Kevin
>
> >
> > I just posted a DAC960 patch for 2.5.42. Tomorrow, I'll post
> > a 2.5.43 patch. There are some minor changes needed (about three
> > lines) for 2.5.43. See the patch posting regarding ACPI
> > interactions.
> >
> > I'd love to hear any good or bad results you have with these
> > patches.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Dave Olien
> > Open Source Developement Lab
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:28:07PM -0400, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> > > >
> > > > looking at that i realise that DAC960 code in 2.5.43
> > > > is not supposed to be tested:
> > > > ======
> > > > #error I am a non-portable driver, please convert me to use the \
> > > > Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt interfaces ======
> > > > am i right?
> > > >
> > > > the following weirdo appears in both gcc-3.1 and 3.2 (also in 2.5.42)
> > > > ======
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_DetectControllers':
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: `Controller' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: for each function it appears in.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, 2.5.42 did this also. It looks like gcc 3.2 doesn't like goto's
> > > which reference variables outside their native scope. You can move the
> > > Controller definition to full function scope to fix that error.
> > >
> > > The DAC960 doesn't seem usable out of the stock kernel build though.
> > > You'll need to try patches previously posted to the list. (Which don't
> > > fully work for me either...)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kevin
--
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-19 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-17 15:49 [2.5.43] (DAC960 compile failure) Kevin Brosius
2002-10-19 12:11 ` Kevin Brosius [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB14BED.722CFB06@compuserve.com \
--to=cobra@compuserve.com \
--cc=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.