All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, lse-tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:23:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB9A84F.9040506@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DB992B7.E8919930@us.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --]

mingming cao wrote:

>Here is what I saw:
>
>[root@elm3b83 shmctl]# ./shmctl01
>shmctl01    1  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
>pass #1
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>
These failures are caused by a bug in the ltp test. See the attached patch.

>shmctl01    2  PASS  :  pid, size, # of attaches and mode are correct -
>pass #2
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    0  INFO  :  shmdt() failed - 22
>shmctl01    3  FAIL  :  # of attaches is incorrect - 0
>
This one is odd. The testcase contains races, but they can only increase 
# of attaches.
Could you strace shmctl01?
The testcase with shmat(), then fork() fails.

--
    Manfred

[-- Attachment #2: patch-ltp --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 714 bytes --]

diff -u ltp-orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c ltp-20021008/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c
--- ltp-orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c	Tue May 21 15:55:56 2002
+++ ltp-20021008/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/shmctl/shmctl01.c	Fri Oct 25 22:14:23 2002
@@ -252,10 +252,12 @@
 
 			if (stat_time == FIRST) {
 				test = set_shmat();
+			} else {
+				test = set_shared;
 			}
 
 			/* do an assignement for fun */
-			(int *)test = i;
+			*(int *)test = i;
 
 			/* pause until we get a signal from stat_cleanup() */
 			rval = pause();
@@ -273,7 +275,7 @@
 		}
 	}
 	/* sleep briefly to ensure correct execution order */
-	usleep(25000);
+	usleep(250000);
 }
 
 /*

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-25 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18  0:14 [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU mingming cao
2002-10-20 13:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-20 17:27   ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 18:11     ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 19:00       ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 21:49         ` [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch mingming cao
2002-10-24 22:29           ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 22:56             ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-24 23:30               ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-24 23:59                 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-25  0:35                   ` [Lse-tech] " Rick Lindsley
2002-10-25  1:07                     ` Robert Love
2002-10-25  0:07                 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  0:24                   ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-25  4:18                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:53                   ` mingming cao
2002-10-25  7:27                     ` Rusty Russell
2002-10-25  5:36                 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-25 16:53                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-24 23:23             ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 14:21               ` [Lse-tech] " Paul Larson
2002-10-25 17:17                 ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 18:20                   ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 18:51                     ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 19:06                       ` Paul Larson
2002-10-25 20:14                         ` mingming cao
2002-10-25 20:23                       ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2002-10-25  0:38             ` Cliff White
2002-10-31 17:52             ` [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH]updated ipc lock patch [PERFORMANCE RESULTS] Bill Hartner
2002-10-21 19:18       ` [PATCH]IPC locks breaking down with RCU Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 19:36         ` Hugh Dickins
2002-10-21 19:41         ` mingming cao
2002-10-21 20:14           ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-10-21 18:07   ` mingming cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DB9A84F.9040506@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=plars@linuxtestproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.