Re: [PATCH] i_blkbits inconsistency

[Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>]

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> Fix premature -EIO from blkdev_get_block: bdget initialize bd_block_size
> consistent with bd_inode->i_blkbits (assigned by new_inode).  Otherwise,
> subsequent set_blocksize can find bd_block_size doesn't need updating,
> and skip updating i_blkbits, leaving them inconsistent.
> 
> --- 2.5.44/fs/block_dev.c       Sat Oct 19 07:14:45 2002
> +++ linux/fs/block_dev.c        Fri Oct 25 21:30:41 2002
> @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@
>                         new_bdev->bd_queue = NULL;
>                         new_bdev->bd_contains = NULL;
>                         new_bdev->bd_inode = inode;
> +                       new_bdev->bd_block_size = (1 << inode->i_blkbits);
>                         new_bdev->bd_part_count = 0;
>                         new_bdev->bd_invalidated = 0;
>                         inode->i_mode = S_IFBLK;

Thanks, sleuth.   Wondering if we can we remove bd_block_size
and simply use (1 << bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits) everywhere?