From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolm2.tiscalinet.be [212.35.2.51]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5156485A for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:26:29 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3DBB3423.5020408@freebel.net> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:32:35 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randolph Chung Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: mkfs.xfs (xfsprogs-2.3.5) failled References: <3DB5776100000C32@ocpmta8.be.tiscali.com> <3DBAD364.9060301@freebel.net> <20021026211822.GJ22052@tausq.org> <3DBB30C0.6060000@freebel.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: __pu_err disapear in ..asm64? It doesn't seems to be an error, so don't we need anymore?? Joel Soete wrote: > > > Randolph Chung wrote: > >> In reference to a message from Joel Soete, dated Oct 26: >> >>> i386 declare: "extern void __get_user_bad(void);" >>> ... >>> but not define elsewhere? (is it there so that the build of the >>> kernel failed if that case was requested to run properly?) >> >> >> >> yes. >> >> >>> PS: afaik on i386 only put_user_u64 is define why not pending get_user? >> >> >> >> on first glance i haven't found any code that uses get_user with 64-bit >> quantities. > > > Not found too. > >> if you have a specific need for this, please let me know. > > > No spefic need, thanks. It was just because mips (32bits) already > foreseen it and it would be already complete :) > >> >> in the mean time, i've checked in support for put_user with 64-bit >> values. This is in 2.4.19-pa24 > > > Great, I will test it (in fact I was not so far; just a problem of > writing the right way). > > Anyway couldn't we also consider __get_user_bad() and __get_kernel_bad() > for _default:_ case (just to avoid erronious case: with the problem > encounter with xfs test I was near to loose all my system :(( )? > >> >> Let me know if this works for you. i've tested it only lightly. >> > Just have to wait a few days to test at office. > > Thanks again. > > See you, > Joel > >