All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: "Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S." <pavan.kumar@wipro.com>
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AIM Bench Mark results for different kernels
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 22:48:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DBF80C6.9DB6D9F8@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7F396B9772328640B7593FA817EEEDAD05FF3C@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com

"Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S." wrote:
> 
> 
> AIM Independent Resource Benchmark - Suite IX v1.1, January 22, 1996
> Copyright (c) 1996 - 2001 Caldera International, Inc. All Rights
> Reserved
> 
>

Thanks.

This would be enormously less painful to read if you could fix
your mailer to not word-wrap your content.

All the compute-intensive workloads are down ~1% because of the
increase of HZ from 100 to 1000.

Things like "sequential disk reads (K)/second" would be more 
interesting if they were accompanied by CPU utilisation.  But then,
CPU utilisation comparisons with 2.4 kernels are suspect because of
the HZ change.  Probably it would be more informative if the 2.5
kernel was altered to run at HZ=100, or run 2.4 at HZ-1000.

2.5.43 outperformed 2.5.42 and 2.5.44 by a *lot* in many tests.
That is unexpected.  It might be worth double-checking that result.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-30  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-30  6:25 AIM Bench Mark results for different kernels Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S.
2002-10-30  6:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-30  9:16 Pavan Kumar Reddy N.S.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DBF80C6.9DB6D9F8@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavan.kumar@wipro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.