Re: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch update

[Valette Eric <eric.valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>]

Jens Haug wrote:
>>I do agree. The more people do not want other to look/critic their code, 
>>the more they pretend what they do is a kind of black art, and do not 
>>document it or make design document :-) Fixing bug is annoying, making a 
>>new release and advising to report a problem on it is so more fun.
> 
> 
> I don't think this is about fun. There are people getting paid by
> Intel for this, aren't they? Would you like it if your boss could 
> have a look at a list of mistakes you made in your job? Man, I sure 
> am glad there's no list with *my* mistakes! Yes, I know that bugs 
> are perfectly normal in such projects, no need to be ashamed. But 
> maybe their boss doesn't know that?
> Just speculating here...

I have been working for famous companies and yes having a bug tracking 
system was required and compled with the source management system. If 
your company is responsible, they want to have no bug in the system they 
distribute.

At a macroeconomic level, I bet if Intel sell more P4 for mobile devices 
because linux runs on them, yes they want to have a good ACPI system and 
a bug tracking system will help achieving this goal.


-- 
    __
   /  `                   	Eric Valette
  /--   __  o _.          	6 rue Paul Le Flem
(___, / (_(_(__         	35740 Pace

Tel: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76	Fax: +33 (0)2 99 85 26 76
E-mail: valette-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org








-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf