From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:32:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:32:57 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:54941 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:32:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3DC06CAE.8040806@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:35:10 -0800 From: Matthew Dobson Reply-To: colpatch@us.ibm.com Organization: IBM LTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Blanchard CC: linux-kernel , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] use asm-generic/topology.h References: <3DC056C2.4070609@us.ibm.com> <20021030233107.GB4820@krispykreme> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anton Blanchard wrote: > Hi Matt, > > >>use_generic_topology.patch >> >>This patch changes ppc64 & alpha to use the generic topology.h for the >>non-NUMA case rather than redefining the same macros. It is much easier >>to maintain one set of generic non-NUMA macros than several. > > > Looks good from the ppc64 perspective. > > Anton Glad to have the positive feedback. It doesn't really change how anything works, just eliminates duplicate code and makes modifying the generic behavior simpler. Anyone that works with alpha want to verify that I haven't inadvertently hosed your topology file? Cheers! -Matt