From: Peter Rival <frival@zk3.dec.com>
To: colpatch@us.ibm.com
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] use asm-generic/topology.h
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:42:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DC06CAE.8040806@us.ibm.com
Matthew Dobson wrote:
> Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> >
> >>use_generic_topology.patch
> >>
> >>This patch changes ppc64 & alpha to use the generic topology.h for the
> >>non-NUMA case rather than redefining the same macros. It is much easier
> >>to maintain one set of generic non-NUMA macros than several.
> >
> >
> > Looks good from the ppc64 perspective.
> >
> > Anton
>
> Glad to have the positive feedback. It doesn't really change how
> anything works, just eliminates duplicate code and makes modifying the
> generic behavior simpler.
>
> Anyone that works with alpha want to verify that I haven't inadvertently
> hosed your topology file?
>
I'd say six of one, half-dozen of the other. I've been working with another
engineer on updated patches that among other things make NUMA work on Alpha
again. We're also re-working much of the surrounding code, including much of
this file anyway - Marvel uses a much different topology than Wildfire.
It looks fine to me, but realistically the only opinion I can give for real is
a shoulder shrug, as I'm not exactly sure when the code will be ready for
submission. Actually, the patch looks just like a part of the patch we have
working, just without Marvel support. Then again, I suppose IBM would have a
hard time doing that, huh? ;)
- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-31 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 22:01 [patch] use asm-generic/topology.h Matthew Dobson
2002-10-30 23:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-10-30 23:35 ` Matthew Dobson
2002-10-31 1:42 ` Peter Rival [this message]
2002-10-31 2:11 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DC08A9C.F5B267A8@zk3.dec.com \
--to=frival@zk3.dec.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.