All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Ouellette <ouellettes@videotron.ca>
To: allen <aef@prismnet.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [NEW EXTENSION] Condition Match
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:34:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC1DA39.7040501@videotron.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200210292243.07631.aef@prismnet.com

allen wrote:

>On Tuesday 29 October 2002 12:54 pm, Stephane Ouellette wrote:
>  
>
>>   I developped last week a new extension to Netfilter in order to
>>enable or disable a set of rules using /proc files.
>>    
>>
>
>
>Yeah, as others have said, the idea is definitely cool.
>
>I hate to admit that I might use it this way.  God help me...
>
>I'm having visions of debugging impossibly complex
>booboo's, and chasing after phantom problems that
>appear and disappear and not remembering that
>I or someone had done or could have done this.
>
>Can you think of a way to implement far greater
>"manageability"
>
>?
>

   I'm not sure to understand your question...   :-(

>
>Or what are your thoughts about that ?
>
>Maybe it is a "user-be-ware" thing best left to
>some odd application to keep track of.
>
>Hmn...
>
>But... the "rules" would appear though... right ?
>
>With an "iptables -L" ?
>  
>

   The rules appear with "iptables -L"  such as :

0   0   ACCEPT      udp    ---    *    *     0.0.0.0/0   0.0.0.0/0   
 condition quake udp dpt:27960

>And current "state" ?
>

   No, the current state is only available if you read the /proc file.

>-AEF
>
>  
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-01  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-29 18:54 [NEW EXTENSION] Condition Match Stephane Ouellette
2002-10-29 23:00 ` Brad Chapman
2002-10-30  2:52 ` Robin Johnson
2002-10-30  4:43 ` allen
2002-10-30  9:04   ` Harald Welte
2002-10-30 10:34     ` Peter Surda
2002-10-30 11:59     ` Brad Chapman
2002-11-01  1:34   ` Stephane Ouellette [this message]
2002-11-02 14:47 ` Harald Welte
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-01  1:51 Stephane Ouellette
2002-11-02  0:41 ` allen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC1DA39.7040501@videotron.ca \
    --to=ouellettes@videotron.ca \
    --cc=aef@prismnet.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.