From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Still wrong reported file size after --rebuild-tree Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:07:33 +0300 Message-ID: <3DC2ED15.9080403@namesys.com> References: <20021030193045.69179289.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <200211011630.13195.vitaly@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20021030193045.69179289.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Vitaly Fertman Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UGhpbGlwcGUgR3JhbW91bGzDqQ==?= , reiserfs Vitaly Fertman wrote: >Hi,=20 > >On Wednesday 30 October 2002 21:30, Philippe Gramoull=C3=A9 wrote: > =20 > >>Hi, >> >>I just wanted to let you know that after rebuilding the tree for a 500Go >>volume, i still have wrong file size reported : >> >>/dev/sdb1 572418604 174714996 397703608 31% /storage >> >># ls -l >>total 4928006 >>-r-x-wx-wx 1 daemon 324231 32768 Jan 1 1970 25s.jpg >>-r-x--x--- 1 19415372 19415373 83388383504122186 Aug 13 1970 25s_lb.jpg >>-r--rw-rw- 1 19415354 19415355 83388306194710840 Aug 13 1970 25slight.jpg= =20 >>-r---wxrwx 1 19415331 19415332 83388207410463009 Aug 13 1970 25slight_ln.= jpg=20 >> >> =20 >> > >ReiserFS can handle 64 bit file sizes, so from the reiserfsck point of vie= w =20 >these are correct sizes.=20 > > =20 > You mean to say that you haven't written code to check that file sizes=20 are correct, yes? --=20 Hans