From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Still wrong reported file size after --rebuild-tree
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:05:12 -0800
Message-ID: <3DC77BB8.4040003@namesys.com>
References: <20021030193045.69179289.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <200211011630.13195.vitaly@namesys.com> <3DC2ED15.9080403@namesys.com> <200211021710.15930.vitaly@namesys.com>
Reply-To: reiser@namesys.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11913-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20021030193045.69179289.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"; format="flowed"
To: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
Cc: =?KOI8-R?Q?Philippe_Gramoulle=27?= <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Vitaly Fertman wrote:

>On Saturday 02 November 2002 00:07, Hans Reiser wrote:
> =20
>
>>Vitaly Fertman wrote:
>>   =20
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>On Wednesday 30 October 2002 21:30, Philippe Gramoull=C3=A9 wrote:
>>>     =20
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I just wanted to let you know that after rebuilding the tree for a 50=
0Go
>>>>volume, i still have wrong file size reported :
>>>>
>>>>/dev/sdb1            572418604 174714996 397703608  31% /storage
>>>>
>>>># ls -l
>>>>total 4928006
>>>>-r-x-wx-wx 1 daemon   324231      32768 Jan  1  1970 25s.jpg
>>>>-r-x--x--- 1 19415372 19415373 83388383504122186 Aug 13 1970 25s_lb.j=
pg
>>>>-r--rw-rw- 1 19415354 19415355 83388306194710840 Aug 13 1970 25slight=
=2Ejpg
>>>>-r---wxrwx 1 19415331 19415332 83388207410463009 Aug 13 1970
>>>>25slight_ln.jpg
>>>>       =20
>>>>
>>>ReiserFS can handle 64 bit file sizes, so from the reiserfsck point of=

>>>view these are correct sizes.
>>>     =20
>>>
>>You mean to say that you haven't written code to check that file sizes
>>are correct, yes?
>>   =20
>>
>
>No, I meant that it is considered as a legal situation to have a size in=
=20
>a file statdata greater then its real body size. Thus you can truncate=20
>the file to the greater size.=20
>
>However, if you are sure that you do not have files with such holes at=20
>the end you can use --ajust-file-sizes option in rebuild and fix-fixable=

>modes - fixable here - to correct such statdata's file sizes to file bod=
y=20
>sizes. (Sorry that I have not mentioned about this option in my previous=
=20
>email).=20
>
> =20
>
Ah, interesting.

Hans