All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miwako Nakai <nickey@be.mbn.or.jp>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] cache buffer size
Date: Tue Nov  5 17:29:02 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DC85406.C03B0AA0@be.mbn.or.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021105151020.D27825@sistina.com

Thank you, Mr.Mauelshagen

JFS can not have fixed block size. But I heard from JFS group in IBM
that on 2.5 or later it will be improved. I do not know JFS will have
fixed block size or not. They said 'improved'.

I think LVM(2?) will be able to handle non-consitant block size on
2.5 well.

"Heinz J . Mauelshagen" wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:07:40PM +0900, Miwako Nakai wrote:
> > I'm using jfs on lvm/raid5 with snapshot.
> >
> > When I copy file, it happens frequently
> > 'raid5: switching cache buffer size XXX -> XXX'.
> > This message appears to syslog. It caused speed down to access disks.
> > So, I cut this message. It's seemed ok.
> 
> Could be filesystems with different blocksizes accessing the underlying
> raid5 md through LVM constantly forcing the raid5 stripe cache to be flushed.
> If that's the case, you want to put filesystems of the _same_ blocksize
> onto all of the logical volumes allocated to the raid5 device.
> 
> Regards,
> Heinz    -- The LVM Guy --
> 
> >
> > But it's still going to switch cache buffer size. I think it cost
> > some cpu time. When switching buffer cache size, it always happen
> > reflushing memories.
> >
> > I want to fix buffer size. What shall I do?
> > I asked JFS group. But they do nothing about cache buffer.
> >
> > kernel 2.4.20-pre10-ac2
> > lvm    1.0.5
> > jfs    1.0.23
> >
> > --
> > nakai@ezinc.com
> 
> *** Software bugs are stupid.
>     Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> Heinz Mauelshagen                                 Sistina Software Inc.
> Senior Consultant/Developer                       Am Sonnenhang 11
>                                                   56242 Marienrachdorf
>                                                   Germany
> Mauelshagen@Sistina.com                           +49 2626 141200
>                                                        FAX 924446
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

--
nakai@ezinc.com

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-05 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-31 21:11 [linux-lvm] cache buffer size Miwako Nakai
2002-11-05  8:15 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-05 17:29   ` Miwako Nakai [this message]
2002-11-06  7:08     ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-06 11:17 Steve Best
2002-11-06 22:04 ` Miwako Nakai
2002-11-07 11:03 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-11-08  2:12   ` Luca Berra
2002-11-08  8:54     ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DC85406.C03B0AA0@be.mbn.or.jp \
    --to=nickey@be.mbn.or.jp \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.