From: kenny gorman <kgorman@panix.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Reiserfs versions
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:05:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DDA5320.9070605@panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021119105123.A3473@namesys.com
I am sorta confused. I downloaded and compiled the latest
reiserfsprogs, I also updated my rpm. How do I know what version I am
runnning then?
rpm -q shows reiserfs-3.x.0k_pre10-8, but in /usr/local/sbin I have the
latest 3.6.4 stuff. How can I be sure my system is updated correctly?
Should I remove the rpm?
thx
-kg
Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:46:19PM -0800, kenny gorman wrote:
>
>
>>I poked around suse's site, and found the 'certified kernel' with:
>>2.4.16-64gb smp
>
>
> This one is ok.
>
>
>>reiserfs-3.x.0k_pre10-8
>
>
> This one is not.
>
>
>>See any reason why this combination is not a good idea?
>
>
> reiserfs-3.x.0k_pre10 sounds like something very old.
>
>
>>How do the version numbers work? I am confused about the 3.x notation
>>and the 3.6 notation you used below...I upgraded my reiserfsprogs to
>>3.6.4 just in case, but the filesystem rpm is still 3.x.0k_pre10-8 right?
>
>
> The 3.x notation is the obsoletted one which was supposed to mean 3.5 and 3.6,
> recently we changed that confusing scheme to just 3.6.
>
>
> You can get reiserfsprogs 3.6.4 from our ftp site, build build rpm from it,
> and then replace your reiserfs package with fersly built one,
> so that your RPM database is in consistent state with what you actually have.
>
> Or may be SuSE people have newer reiserfsprogs already in updates.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-19 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-18 23:30 Reiserfs versions kenny gorman
2002-11-19 6:35 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-11-19 7:46 ` kenny gorman
2002-11-19 7:51 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-11-19 15:05 ` kenny gorman [this message]
2002-11-19 15:08 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-11-19 16:22 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-11-19 16:26 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-11-19 16:38 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-11-19 16:41 ` kenny gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DDA5320.9070605@panix.com \
--to=kgorman@panix.com \
--cc=green@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.