All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nero <neroz@iinet.net.au>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] rmap15, rmap14c and rc1aa1 with contest
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:23:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE0D2DE.1090006@iinet.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DE0D157.9020906@iinet.net.au>

Nero wrote:

> noload:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       84.6    95      0       0       1.00
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      84.2    96      0       0       1.00
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       41.0    49      0       0       inf

The time for rc1aa1 here is obviously wrong - this is a bug in contest, 
according to Dr. Kolivas :-)

>
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       140.8   55      133     45      1.66
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      139.4   56      126     45      1.65
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [2]       133.9   14      211     84      inf
>
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       164.8   51      33      19      1.95
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      160.1   53      33      21      1.90
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       166.2   49      44      23      inf
>
> read_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       0.0     0       0       7       0.00
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      121.0   72      20      7       1.44
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       111.2   79      34      14      inf
>
> rmap15 OOM'd the cc1 process twice and fscked this run up.
>
> list_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       99.2    84      0       7       1.17
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      100.7   83      0       7       1.20
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       96.7    85      0       8       inf
>
> mem_load:
> Kernel [runs]           Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> 2.4.19-rmap15 [1]       111.2   80      96      8       1.31
> 2.4.19-rmap14c [1]      106.1   82      96      9       1.26
> 2.4.20-rc1aa1 [1]       126.3   66      77      3       inf
>



  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-24 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-24 13:17 [BENCHMARK] rmap15, rmap14c and rc1aa1 with contest Nero
2002-11-24 13:23 ` Nero [this message]
2002-11-24 13:32 ` Con Kolivas
2002-11-24 13:34 ` Nero
2002-11-24 17:39 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DE0D2DE.1090006@iinet.net.au \
    --to=neroz@iinet.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.