From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: acc@cs.stanford.edu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@cs.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 16 more potential buffer overruns in 2.5.48
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:51:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE94F07.5000904@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021120084934.GA24014@Xenon.stanford.edu>
Andy Chou wrote:
> [BUG] Hw imposed bound?
> /u1/acc/linux/2.5.48/drivers/net/3c515.c:553:corkscrew_scan:
> ERROR:BUFFER:553:553:Array bounds error: options[8] indexed with [8]
yep, that's a bug (if an extremely unlikely one). thanks, fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-30 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-20 8:49 [CHECKER] 16 more potential buffer overruns in 2.5.48 Andy Chou
2002-11-30 23:51 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-20 16:56 Steven French
2002-11-20 17:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-11-20 17:11 ` Chris Friesen
2002-11-20 18:02 ` Mark Mielke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DE94F07.5000904@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=acc@cs.stanford.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mc@cs.stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.